BSL (Scotland) Act 2015 – from the SCoD website. Updated on 13/07/2021
Today, the BSL (Scotland) Bill received Royal Assent. It is now the British Sign Language (Scotland) Act 2015.
After the 4 week period is finished, the Presiding Officer (Tricia Marwick MSP) of the Scottish Parliament submits the bill for Royal Assent.
Once the bill receives Royal Assent, it becomes an Act of the Scottish Parliament
All bills passed by the Scottish Parliament must be signed by the Queen before they can become law. This procedure reflects the fact that Scotland remains part of the UK and all UK legislation must get the Royal Assent.
Royal Assent and the Great Seal of Scotland
Royal Assent is needed for a bill to become an Act of the Scottish Parliament.
The Queen must give their consent for a bill to become a law. It is the final check that the Scottish Parliament is doing a proper job in passing laws that will be suitable for the country. This is now only part of the formal process, as the Queen very rarely says “No” to a new law.
How does Royal Assent happen?
Once a bill has been passed, there is a 4 week period when the bill may be challenged by the law officers of Scotland and England:
- Advocate General (Lord Keen of Elie) or the
- Lord Advocate (Frank Mulholland QC) in Scotland. Or by the
- Attorney General (Jeremy Wright QC) or by the
- Secretary of State for Scotland (David Mundell) in Westminster.
Each person on the list above gets a letter from the Scottish Parliament to say that the Bill has passed.
A challenge to a bill would normally only happen if the bill is based on something that is not a devolved matter or if it would badly affect reserved matters, or the Scottish Parliament wishes to reconsider the bill.
If no objection is made by the law officers, or the four week period has passed, the Presiding Officer writes to the Queen sending her a copy of the Bill and a Royal Warrant for her to sign – these are then delivered to Buckingham Palace.
When the Bill and Royal Warrant are returned to the Scottish Parliament, the Warrant is hand-stitched together.
The documents then go to Registers of Scotland, followed by the National Records of Scotland, in Edinburgh, where the Great Seal of Scotland is applied.
Notices are then placed in the official journals of record: the London, Edinburgh and Belfast Gazettes signalling that Royal Assent has been given.
Then the Bill is part of the laws in Scotland.
The BSL translation can be viewed here.
The Education and Culture Committee met to look at all the proposed amendments to the BSL (Scotland) Bill at Stage 2 on Tuesday 2nd June 2015. Mary Scanlon MSP withdrew her amendments on the needs of families with deaf children to be included in the Bill. This should be part of the guidance that may accompany the Bill.
The amendments that were accepted were:
The First National Plan
The first National Plan will be produced and presented to the Scottish Parliament within 2 years of the Bill becoming an Act. This plan will be published as soon as is reasonably practicable after the Scottish Parliament receives and approves it. It will be published in English as well as BSL.
The second and ongoing National Plans
These will be produced and presented to the Scottish Parliament at intervals of no more than 6 years. So every 6 years, another National Plan will have to be produced and presented to the Parliament, then published in English as well as BSL.
(6 A) the Scottish Ministers are to have regard to the need to make that consultation accessible to persons who use British Sign Language and who are deaf, or deafblind.
Deafblind people who use BSL have been added to the Bill.
Listed authorities’ BSL plans
(iv) where the authority has previously published at least one Authority Plan, to such comments as are contained in any Performance Review which relates to the most recently published such plan
This has been changed to
(iva) to the most recently published report under section 5, Progress Reports.
Listed authorities’ British Sign Language plans
(6 A) the Scottish Ministers are to have regard to the need to make that consultation accessible to persons who use British Sign Language and who are deaf, or deafblind.
This sentence has been added into this section too.
These amendments/changes are to make sure that all sections of the Bill have the same wording in them now that the changes have been made.
Publication by listed authority
These amendments/changes take away or change what is written in section 3 so that all sections of the Bill have the same wording in them. This includes the public authorities added to the list after the second or future National Plans have been published.
(6B) A requirement which this section imposes to publish a revised Authority Plan includes (but is not satisfied by) making the content of the plan, and an explanation of the changes it contains, publicly available, in such form and manner as the listed authority publishing it considers appropriate, in British Sign Language.
This has been added and means that if the public authority makes changes to its language plan, it must explain the changes in BSL and publish the changed plan in BSL.
The Performance Review has been changed completely to Progress reports. This is the change that the Local Councils wanted as they do not report directly to the Scottish Government Ministers.
The report of the review of the first National Plan will be produced within 3 years of the date that the first National Plan is published. We will produce a timetable of the dates for publishing plans and reporting if the Bill becomes an Act.
Forms of British Sign Language
These amendments/changes add in a new section ‘Forms of British Sign Language’ which provides that references to BSL in the Bill are to both the visual form and the tactile form of BSL, except where the Bill deals with the publication of National and Authority Plans.
Tactile BSL is Hands-on BSL that some Deafblind people use.
When the National Plan and Authority Plans are published, they will be published in BSL and English only.
Other public authorities and bodies have been added to the list in the Bill.
The Commissioner for Children and Young People in Scotland.
The Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland.
All 32 local Councils
All the Health Boards including special Health Boards
The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator.
The Police Investigations and Review Commissioner.
A body which is a “post-16 education body” for the purposes of the Further and Higher Education (Scotland) Act 2005.
The Scottish Commission for Human Rights.
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service.
The Scottish Housing Regulator.
The Scottish Information Commissioner.
The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body.
The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman.
The Standards Commission for Scotland.
Special provision where early dissolution of the Parliament
This section has been removed as the planning and reviewing time tables have been changed so it is no longer needed.
Alteration of date of publication of plan or review in exceptional circumstances
This has been removed because the planning and reviewing time tables have changed.
This section has been added to explain some of the words and sentences used in other sections.
The BSL (Scotland) Bill with all the amendments added can be read here.
Revised cost estimates based on Scottish Government amendments
Alasdair Allan, Minister for Scotland’s Languages, wrote to the Education and Culture Committee
on the 21st May 2015, giving the revised costs estimates for the BSL (Scotland) Bill based on the list of
amendments that the Government would like to see in the Bill.
The BSL (Scotland) Bill was debated in the Chamber of the Scottish Parliament on Tuesday 5th May. The transcript of the debate is available, click here.
The Scottish Parliament Education and Culture Committee has published its Stage 1 Report on the BSL (Scotland) Bill. To read the report, click here. The Executive Summary of the report is available in BSL here.
The Scottish Parliament Education and Culture Committee held an oral evidence gathering session on Tuesday 24th February. This session was divided into three. The first evidence was given by Alan Drew, SDYA; Heather Gray, NDCS; Avril Hepner, BDA; Frankie McLean, Deaf Action; and Nicola Mitchell, a BSL Tutor.
The second session was for public sector agencies – Katy Hetherington, NHS Health Scotland; Nigel Firth, Equality and Diversity Manager, NHS Grampian; Lorraine Vallance, Disability Adviser at Heriot Watt University and Member of Scottish Universities’ Disability Services Group; and for COSLA – Robert Nicol, Chief Officer, Education, Children and Young People, and Maria Dick,Forth Valley Sensory Centre.
The third and last session heard from Carly Brownlie, SASLI; Clark Denmark, BSL Broadcaster; Professor Graham Turner, Heriot-Watt University; and Professor Rob Dunbar, Chair of Celtic Languages, Literature, History and Antiquities, University of Edinburgh.
To read SCoD’s written evidence sent to the Education and Culture Committee, click on the Call for Evidence tab.
Two new documents have been created in BSL in relation to the BSL (Scotland) Bill:
- SPICe (Scottish Parliament Information Centre) briefing: executive summary
- Delegated Powers Memorandum
They are also available in English here.
Scottish Parliament Education and Culture Committee
British Sign Language (Scotland) Bill – Evidence session with Mark Griffin MSP
The Committee held its first evidence session on the British Sign Language (Scotland) Bill on the 16th December 2014.
We said we will give updates throughout the process of the Bill.
We are waiting on an announcement from the Scottish Government on their position on the BSL Bill, which we hope will be positive. We have received several “statements of support” for the Bill from our members and look forward to receiving your comments.
We would also suggest that you contact Mark Griffin MSP to show your support for his Bill. His email address is Mark.Griffin.firstname.lastname@example.org.
Three things we would encourage our member organisations to do:
1. To wait and take account of the Scottish Government position before you submit your evidence.
2. You work to reach the Deaf Community in your area and ensure they are informed about the Bill and its process. Do let us know about any events or sessions that you are holding. We are happy to help with publicity.
3. To consider the questions asked by the Education and Culture Committee – see above – and to submit your own written evidence. Please do send a copy of your evidence to us at SCoD too, so it can influence what we submit to the Committee. Send a copy to email@example.com.
The Scottish Parliament now has a Facebook page – click here. You will need to have your own Facebook account to access the group page.[/tab] [tab title=”Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)“]
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q. What does the Bill mean?
A. The Bill, if passed, would promote, support and encourage the use of BSL in Scotland. The Scottish Government would have to write a National Plan on how they would do this.
Q. What is a BSL National Plan for Scotland?
A. The National Plan would direct the work of the Scottish Government in promoting, supporting and encouraging the use of BSL in Scotland.
Q. There are some times given in the Bill. What do they mean?
A. When a Bill is introduced and it asks for plans to be written, then the Bill also has to give a timetable for the plan to be written and when it needs to be reported on and what has to be in the report.
Q. So the Bill says that the first National Plan needs to be published no later than 12 months after the start of the session of Parliament after the Act receives Royal Assent. What does this mean?
A. If the Bill is passed in 2015 and is given Royal Assent –before the Parliament closes for the summer – then the first National Plan for BSL needs to be finished by the end of May 2017.
Q. Does the government have to speak to Deaf people when writing the National Plan?
A. Yes. The Bill says that the persons consulted are to be those who will be directly affected by the National Plan or have an interest in the plan – particularly people who use BSL and people who represent BSL users.
Q. Listed authorities’ BSL Plans. As well as the National BSL Plan, public bodies have to write their own plans, what does this mean?
A. All the public bodies listed in the Bill have to write their own BSL Plan that will show how that body is to promote, support and encourage the use of BSL. This means that, for example, a Council will have to consult with BSL users and the organisations that represent Deaf people and write up a BSL plan that will show what the Council will do to make sure services and information are available in BSL. The BSL plans written by public bodies must tie in with what is written in the National Plan.
Q. When do public bodies have to publish their BSL plans?
A. BSL plans must be published no later than 12 months after the National BSL Plan. So the first BSL plans will have to be written and published before the end of May 2018 if the Bill becomes an Act.
Q. What is the Performance Review mentioned in the Bill?
A. This is the report of how the National BSL Plan has worked or not. It will look at good practice and any examples of poor performance. The first Performance Review will take place before the end of June 2019.
Q. What is Schedule 1 in the Bill?
A. This allows the Scottish Parliament to change when the National BSL Plans as well as the Performance Review and public body BSL plans need to be published.
Q. What is Schedule 2 in the Bill?
A. This is the list of public bodies that have to write and publish a BSL Plan.
Q. What does consultation with Deaf people mean?
A. This is not listed in the Bill. This is something that could be listed in guidance if it is decided that guidance is needed. At the moment, there is no reference to guidance in the bill.
Call for Evidence
Call for Evidence
The British Sign Language (Scotland) Bill was introduced in the Scottish Parliament by Mark Griffin MSP on 29th October 2014.
The Bill and accompanying documents are available on the Parliament’s website in English and BSL at:
The Education and Culture Committee has been given the role of gathering evidence to support the Bill and to analyse this evidence. The Committee has issued a call for evidence which closes on Monday 2nd February 2015.
All responses should be sent to the Committee clerks at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Or by post to:
Clerk to the Education and Culture Committee
The Scottish Parliament
The Committee is happy to get responses in written or BSL (video) format, which should be emailed to the above address. Please keep your response as concise as possible. If you are making a submission in written format, they would prefer to receive it in Microsoft Word.
The purpose of the Bill is to promote the use of British Sign Language (BSL). This includes requiring the Scottish Ministers and specified public authorities (known as listed authorities) to prepare and publish BSL plans.
According to the Bill’s Policy Memorandum—
“The intention is that, by placing this obligation on the Scottish Government and listed authorities, the profile of the language will be heightened and its use in the delivery of services increased.”
“The Bill will not, in itself, close any existing service gaps, but will represent an important stepping stone in the process for the development of BSL provision.”
The Committee’s role at Stage 1 of the parliamentary process is to report to the Parliament on the general principles of the Bill – its overall purpose.
The Committee has put together a list of questions that it would like your views on. These are listed below with examples of possible answers that provide the evidence that could be beneficial to the Committee:[accordion open=”0″] [accordion-item title=”1. In the Policy Memorandum, … “]
1. In the Policy Memorandum, it says that Mark Griffin considered a number of different ways that BSL could be promoted as a language – for example, asking the UK Government to change the Equality Act 2010 or changing other laws to include BSL as a language, or by having a voluntary code that public bodies could follow if they chose to promote BSL in their work. Mark Griffin decided that the best approach was to put forward the BSL (Scotland) Bill.
Do you think we need a change to the law to promote the use of BSL and, if so, why?
Yes, we need a BSL Bill in Scotland.
Why? Under the Equality Act 2010, asking for information and services in BSL is only available as a “reasonable adjustment”. A public body is
“not required to do more than it is reasonable for it to do. What is reasonable for an organisation to do depends, among other factors, on its size and nature, and the nature of the goods, facilities or services it provides, or the public functions it carries out, or the association it runs.” http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/your-rights/service-users/adjustments-disabled-people
“If you are a disabled person and can show that there were barriers an organisation should have identified and reasonable adjustments it could have made, you can bring a claim against it in court. If you win your case, the organisation may be told to pay compensation and make the reasonable adjustments.”
We are unaware of any solicitors who have a sufficient fluency in BSL to represent a Deaf BSL user without the need of a BSL/English Interpreter, and many solicitors are in turn, unaware of the need to provide interpreter support or if they are aware of the need, assume that the Deaf BSL user will pay for this support, even though communication is a two-way process.[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”2. Mark Griffin MSP hopes that the duties under the Bill will …“]
2. Mark Griffin MSP hopes that the duties under the Bill will “lead public authorities to increase the use they make of BSL and the extent to which they are in a position to respond to demand for services in BSL” (Financial Memorandum, paragraph 4).
increase the amount of information that will be made available in BSL? Do you think that public bodies will increase the services that they provide in BSL?
Yes. In 2006, New Zealand passed the NZSL Act. This was reviewed in 2010/11. The review report stated that Deaf SL users had more access to information and services since the Act was passed but that more could be done by national government to promote the use of the language. One of the outcomes from the Act was that more hearing people wanted to learn NZSL and from that, Deaf NZSL users felt themselves to be more involved in the wider community. The review did find that the New Zealand Government needed to be seen to lead the way in providing information and services in NZSL, but that government departments were increasingly applying the Act to the work they do – for example, Ministry of Social Development, including: Child, Youth and Family; Work and Income; Office for Disability Issues; Statistics New Zealand and the Ministry of Health. http://www.odi.govt.nz/what-we-do/nzsl/review-report-2011/how-well-are-the-nzsl-acts-guiding-principles-for-government-departments-being-implemented.html
At the present time, many public services do not provide information and/or services in BSL. For example, the complaint made by Mrs C who raised concerns with the SPSO about the failure by Tayside NHS Board to provide a British Sign Language (BSL) interpreter for a patient – Ms A – in Ninewells Hospital. The complaint which has been investigated is that it was unacceptable for the Board not to provide a BSL interpreter during Ms A’s 12-day in-patient admission to the Hospital in July 2011. http://www.spso.org.uk/investigation-reports/2013/march/tayside-nhs-board-0
The NHS Inform website (the national health information service) has 45 different pieces of information about cancer. None of these are available in BSL. The information that is available in BSL is about the Patient Rights Charter, Communication and Participation, Confidentiality – rights and responsibilities, but there is no information on illnesses and diseases. Where are Deaf BSL users expected to find this information in their own language? http://www.nhsinform.co.uk/Rights/Publications/OtherFormats/BSL[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”3. The Bill is solely about the use of BSL. Could there be …“]
3. The Bill is solely about the use of BSL. Could there be unintended consequences for other languages or forms of communication used by deaf people in Scotland?
Yes. The Bill could have unintended consequences for all people who have a hearing loss, because as public bodies become more BSL aware and Deaf aware, then they should also become more deaf aware generally. An unintended consequence for other languages could be that there is less money in the pot for interpreting and translating, but if the person whose first language is not English is hearing, then they have an advantage that Deaf BSL users do not, in that they can learn to speak and read English. This is not something that Deaf BSL users can do as an adult.[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”4. The Bill will require the Scottish Government to prepare and publish …“]
4. The Bill will require the Scottish Government to prepare and publish a BSL National Plan and a BSL Performance Review every four years. The Scottish Government will also be required to designate a Minister with lead responsibility for. What should this Minister do?
The fit would be with the Minister for Learning, Science & Scotland’s Languages, who would have the same responsibility for BSL as for Scotland’s other languages; although since the Scottish Government operates on the basis of collective responsibility, all decisions reached by Ministers, individually or collectively, are binding on all members of the Government. So responsibility for BSL, the National Plan and the Performance Review would be across government.
[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”5. The BSL Performance Review provides the basis for the Parliament to …“]
5. The BSL Performance Review provides the basis for the Parliament to hold the Scottish Ministers to account, and for Ministers to hold the public authorities listed to account. If listed authorities say they will do something relating to the promotion of BSL, will the Performance Review process make sure they are held to account?
If the Performance Review is carried out using the co-production model so that members of the Deaf Community, their families and carers as well as those organisations that support them are involved, then public bodies can be held accountable. It is important that Deaf BSL users are involved in the scrutiny of the Authority Plans as this affects them and their families. It may be that there is a need to set a baseline through research into what is actually available at the present time – this could be done through a mapping exercise.[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”6. The Bill requires the public authorities listed to prepare and publish …“]
6. The Bill requires the public authorities listed to prepare and publish BSL Plans in each parliamentary session – every four years. The Bill sets out what a BSL Plan should include. What do you think the plans should include?
The BSL Plans should be agreed at a local level following engagement with and participation of the local Deaf Community, their families, and carers, as well as local deaf organisations. Deaf BSL users have different needs in terms of information and services can be different depending on where they stay, whether it is an urban, rural or very rural setting. For example, there are areas of Scotland where internet access is not reliable and so access to information can be patchy. In these areas, Deaf BSL users may prefer information on DVD. There may be a need to have online interpreting, for example, in areas of the Highlands and Islands as there are few professionals have the necessary levels of BSL to communicate directly with Deaf BSL users, and there are very few BSL/English Interpreters.
[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”7. The Policy Memorandum explains the timescales for publication of Authority Plans.“]
7. The Policy Memorandum explains the timescales for publication of Authority Plans. Do you have any comments on these proposed timescales?
The timescales may be quite tight, especially since the public bodies will have to engage with the Deaf Community, their families and carers and the organisations that support them. It may be more realistic to extend the timescale for the Scottish Government to put design and publish the National Plan and carry out the Performance Review, then extend the timescale in proportion for the public bodies.[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”8. In preparing its BSL Plan, a public authority must consult with …“]
8. In preparing its BSL Plan, a public authority must consult with those who are “likely to be directly affected by the Authority Plan or otherwise to have an interest in that Plan” and must take into account any comments made to it during the consultation.
What effect do you think the requirements will have on you or your organisation?
It is important that the Deaf Community, their families and carers as well as the organisations that support them are fully involved with the Authority Plans. The plans should be written using the model of co-production. It is no longer appropriate “to do to people”; those affected need to be at the centre of the planning process.[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”9. The Bill lists 117 public authorities that will have to publish BSL Plans. …“]
9. The Bill lists 117 public authorities that will have to publish BSL Plans. Are there any public authorities you would add to or take off the list?
The Finance Committee would welcome any views on how much the Bill could cost that could help it to analyse the Bill, including answers to the following questions.
For public bodies: [accordion open=”0″] [accordion-item title=”10. If the Bill has any financial implications for your organisation, …“]
10. If the Bill has any financial implications for your organisation, do you believe that they have been accurately reflected in the Financial Memorandum (FM)? If not, please provide details.
[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”11. Do you consider that the estimated costs and savings …“]
11. Do you consider that the estimated costs and savings set out in the FM are reasonable and accurate?
[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”12. If applicable, are you content that your organisation can meet any financial costs …“]
12. If applicable, are you content that your organisation can meet any financial costs that it might incur as a result of the Bill? If not, how do you think these costs should be met?
As Scotland moves towards being an “inclusive communication nation” – from the Independent Living in Scotland’s Principles of Inclusive Communication – then public bodies will have to meet the costs of providing information and services for all people in their communities of interest. This Bill simply focuses on one important aspect of this for people who, in the main, do not have the literacy and language skills to make informed choices in any language other than their first language, BSL.
[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”13. Does the FM accurately reflect the margins of uncertainty …“]
Does the FM accurately reflect the margins of uncertainty associated with the Bill’s estimated costs and with the timescales over which they would be expected to arise?
[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”Other questions about money: 14. Do you believe that the FM reasonably captures all costs …“]
12. Do you believe that the FM reasonably captures all costs associated with the Bill? If not, which other costs might be incurred and by whom?
If a public body does not consult or engage with the Deaf Community, their families and carers and the organisations that support them at the moment, there may be additional costs, but if Scotland is committed to being a fully inclusive country for all its citizens, then public bodies should have a budget set aside for this at the present moment in time.[/accordion-item] [accordion-item title=”15. Do you believe that there may be future costs associated with the Bill, …“]
13. Do you believe that there may be future costs associated with the Bill, for example through secondary legislation? If so, is it possible to quantify these costs?
There may be future costs in terms of ensuring that all public bodies have the capacity to consult and engage with the Deaf Community and its supporters.[/accordion-item] [/accordion] [/tab] [/tabgroup]